Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

More everyday heroes

Today's message comes from an article entitled, "Paying it forward proves lifesaving" in USA Today. If you haven't seen the movie "Pay It Forward", I can't recommend it enough. (Intelliflix.com online DVD rental Movies & Games) Many don't like the ending, but I think it fits and it just shows the magnitude of the idea.

This article is about people following this philosophy in real life. What they are doing is giving kidneys to people in need. This is done all the time but the difference here is that the recipient is required to sign up on the donor list with a partner donor. This means Junior Smith may need a kidney, in order to get on this list, he signs up with Mom Smith who agrees to donate her kidney to the next pair on the list. The end result is a "cascade" of kidneys going to people in need instead of merely a single transplant. It's an amazing idea that truly does "pay it forward".

I encourage you to read the article for more detail and a look at some truly innovative lifesavers.

Thoughts anyone?

Monday, July 23, 2007

It makes me proud to live in the US











Here is an e-mail I received about a memorial for a fallen soldier. I've checked with snopes.com and it is a true story.





What follows is a message from Vicki Pierce about her nephew James' funeral (he was serving our country in Iraq): "I'm back, it was certainly a quick trip, but I have to also say it was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. There is a lot to be said for growing up in a small town in Texas . The service itself was impressive with wonderful flowers and sprays, a portrait of James, his uniform and boots, his awards and ribbons. There was lots of military brass and an eloquent (though inappropriately long winded) Baptist preacher. There were easily 1000 people at the service, filling the church sanctuary as well as the fellowship hall and spilling out into the parking lot. However, the most incredible thing was what happened following the service on the way to the cemetery. We went to our cars and drove to the cemetery escorted by at least 10 police cars with lights flashing and some other emergency vehicles, with Texas Rangers handling traffic. Everyone on the road who was not in the procession, pulled over, got out of their cars, and stood silently and respectfully, some put their hands over their hearts. When we turned off the highway suddenly there were teenage boys along both sides of the street about every 20 feet or so, all holding large American flags on long flag poles, and again with their hands on their hearts. We thought at first it was the Boy Scouts or 4H club or something, but it continued .... for two and a half miles. Hundreds of young people, standing silently on the side of the road with flags. At one point we passed an elementary school, and all the children were outside, shoulder to shoulder holding flags kindergartners, handicapped, teachers, staff, everyone. Some held signs of love a nd support. Then came teenage girls and younge r boys, all holding flags. Then adults. Then families. All standing silently on the side of the road. No one spoke, not even the very young children. The military presence..at least two generals, a fist full of colonels, and representatives from every branch of the service, plus the color guard who attended James, and some who served with him .. was very impressive and respectful, but the love and pride from this community who had lost one of their own was the most amazing thing I've ever been privileged to witness. I've attached some pictures, some are blurry (we were moving), but you can get a small idea of what this was like. These photos are awesome !!


While I wouldn't wish that any family have to receive such news, it would be my hope that if they do, they are lucky enough to live in a town that cares this much.
Thoughts anyone?

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Self-service in New Jersey

Here is the Preamble to the legislation banning self-service gas stations in New Jersey:

The Legislature finds and declares that:
a. Because of the fire hazards directly associated with dispensing fuel, it is in the public interest that gasoline station operators have the control needed over that activity to ensure compliance with appropriate safety procedures, including turning off vehicle engines and refraining from smoking while fuel is dispensed;
b. At self-service gasoline stations in other states, cashiers are often unable to maintain a clear view of the activities of customers dispensing gasoline, or to give their undivided attention to observing customers; therefore, when customers, rather than attendants, are permitted to dispense fuel, it is far more difficult to enforce compliance with safety procedures;
c. The State needs stronger measures to enforce both compliance by customers with the ban on self-service and compliance by attendants with safety procedures;
d. The higher general liability insurance premium rates charged to self-service stations reflect the fact that customers who leave their vehicles to dispense gasoline or other inflammable liquids face significant inconveniences and dangers, including the risks of crime and fall-related personal injury, which are a special burden to drivers with physical infirmities, such as the handicapped and some senior citizens;
e. Exposure to toxic gasoline fumes represents a health hazard when customers dispense their own gasoline, particularly in the case of pregnant women;
f. The significantly higher prices usually charged for full-service gasoline in states where self-service is permitted results in discrimination against low income individuals, who are under greater economic pressure to undergo the inconvenience and hazards of dispensing their own gasoline;
g. The increasing use of self-service has contributed to the diminished availability of repair facilities and maintenance services at gasoline stations;
h. Even in filling stations which offer both self-service and full-service gasoline, customers are less likely, because of the much higher price usually charged for full service, to have attendants make needed maintenance checks, thus causing significant neglect of maintenance and danger both to the customers and to other motorists, as well as the unneeded costly repairs which often result from deferred maintenance;
i. The prohibition of customer self-service does not constitute a restraint of trade in derogation of the general public interest because the Legislature finds no conclusive evidence that self-service gasoline provides a sustained reduction in gasoline prices charged to customers; and
j. A prohibition of self-service gasoline will therefore promote the common welfare by providing increased safety and convenience without causing economic harm to the public in general.


My question is, "ARE YOU KIDDING ME?" The Preamble should really read, "Because we are afraid of the New Jersey Gasoine Retailers Association, we will remain one of the last two states in the United States to inconvenience the public by not allowing the self-service option!!"
First of all, I've seen numerous vehicles sitting idling at the pumps while the attendant, who is usually on either a cell or portable phone, fills the tank without even looking at the drivier, never mind the car for maintenance (see paragraphs A and H). Secondly, most reasonably priced gas stations are solely that, gas stations and not repair facilities so there goes paragraph G! Lastly, C is a joke!!
The latest is the fact that the attendants (who no longer check the oil, wash the windshield, check the tires, or any of the other things implied by this antiquated law) won't even walk around the car to the driver's side to receive payment. I have to roll down my passenger's side window and lean across the car to tell them what I want and then to hand them payment. One time I refused to do that and the attendant removed the nozzle from the tank and told me to leave. Is this "promoting the common welfare" by "increasing safety and convenience" or is this an example of a powerful lobby buying the state legislature?
It's time for New Jersey to join the rest of the union and remove this ban on self-service because we are already practically doing it. I would receive MUCH faster (and more courteous) service if I were allowed to do it myself.
Thoughts anyone?

Thursday, July 19, 2007

A new phone company

Recently I wrote about some of the apparent problems with Verizon's FiOS and I now have an answer. In researching options, I have found that my internet provider, Earthlink, will offer me service that combines my DSL and my phone. The bundle is cheaper than the two services separately (by about $20 a month) and it has more features than my current phone service. In addition, I get to deal with Earthlink which has had exceptional customer service since I first started dealing with them in 1992!!

Since their service remains on copper wire, the issue of losing phone service in a power outage (a problem for fiber) does not exist. Also, they provide E911 (address and phone number) service so I don't have to worry about that in the case of an emergency.

Their service is not nationwide yet, but it's growing quickly. For more info, click here....

Monday, July 16, 2007

Small business deserves respect

A comment on another blog got me to reflecting on my days as a small-business owner. I just wanted to comment on some common misperceptions out there (I know because I had most of them).

When I first bought my business, I heard all the time about how I was "raking in the money" and being the boss I could "set my own schedule". Let me tell you a secret......that's crap!! I got to rake in whatever was left after paying the rent, paying utilities, paying my suppliers, paying my insurer, paying the phone bill, paying taxes, paying for advertising, paying my employees, and paying my loans. Everyone thinks that you take in all this money and put it in your pocket. They forget that all the rest of this has to be paid too. Add to that all the requests for donations and ads by local charities, schools, and sports teams who think that if you say no, you're not a "good neighbor".

In addition, everyone thinks that you don't have to ever go to work because "you've got people". Well, what happens when you're out to dinner and the "people" that's working calls to tell you they have to go home because they are really sick? Who do you think covers then? What happens when you want to go away on vacation and there is no one over the age of 16 left in town to watch after your business? Do you go away?

My family and I spent a lot of time, energy, money, and worry running a small business for 15 years (longer than the national average) and I wouldn't trade that experience for anything. I really enjoyed much of that life, but am VERY glad to be rid of other parts of it. The point here, however, is that you should appreciate the person behind the counter of the local store. In all likelihood, they have sacrificed much to be there. They deserve your respect and hopefully have earned your patronage. If they do well, please tell them. It would probably be the highlight of their day.

Thoughts anyone?

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Head-on EMS

Today I was reading an article entitled, "The Risky Side of Response" by David Williams and Christine Zalar in the April 2007 edition of JEMS magazine. It was a study of the number of fatalities and injuries that occur during emergency transport of the dead and dying across the United States. While the article was mainly focused the difference between air ambulance transport and ground transport, I was struck by some of the statistics on injuries/fatalities occurring during ground transport because this is something I am quite familiar with.

I've been a volunteer EMT for over 20 years and currently serve with 2 different agencies. I have been fortunate that I've only witnessed one accident involving an ambulance which sent members (or anyone else) to the hospital. According to the research in the article, there are 32.5 fatalities resulting from ground ambulance accidents. Why is this statistic not a matter of concern to any single government agency? The FAA regulates the air ambulance industry, but no single agency regulates the ground transport ambulance. In fact, the authors of the article had difficultly even piecing together the statistics because there is not even a central reporting agency.

One of the items mentioned in the article was a need for training. I know from personal experience that there is no standard for driver training. One agency requires certification from the National Safety Council's Coaching the Emergency Vehicle Operator course as well as successful completion of a cone driving course. The other agency does not. A third agency that I've worked with merely required some over-the-road driving time with a "trainer". There was no objective criteria. These agencies are all located in the state of New Jersey and are in fact, less than five miles apart.

In addition, there is no limit to hours worked. This too, is amazing. A standard "over the road" trucker is only allowed to work a limited number of hours, but the EMTs in this area have no such regulation. Many of them will work 12 hour shifts, some work a full day at their "day job" and then serve as a volunteer at night. Depending upon how busy the agency is, this could be a very long time without rest.

The question then arises, what is the government doing about this? It's not as easy as merely mandating training because they need to balance the fact that many of these services are run by volunteers who must weigh their training time versus their availability. In addition, to mandate new training on the local level means that 73 agencies need to be monitored in our county alone. This is a great deal of oversight required by the regulating agency.

Clearly, the burden falls upon the EMT training center. The national curriculum needs to expand the amount of time spent on ambulance operations which includes driver training. (In fact, the EMT curriculum should be reexamined in general, but that is a different blog.) Right now it is a 3 hour (out of 130) overview of operations which includes driver training, radios, call reports, and other things.

Thoughts anyone?

Sunday, July 8, 2007

Another reason to never do business with Verizon!!

Warning....Verizon is one of the most disreputable companies in the United States!!!!!

In reading news today, I've come across another example of how dishonest Verizon is. It seems that when they give you the new FiOS service (better, faster, stronger), they remove the copper line to your home and replace it with fiber-optic line. This means,

"But once the copper is pulled, it's difficult to switch back to the
traditional phone system or less expensive Digital Subscriber Line service. And
Verizon isn't required, in most instances, to lease fiber to rival phone companies, as it is with the copper infrastructure. What's more, anyone who owns Powderly's house
[the man in the example in the article] in the future will face higher bills with FiOS than another home with copper."

The article details how Verizon claims it tells customers prior to switching that it is their intention to remove the copper, but a quick check with a Verizon customer that I know reveals that they were not told either. They are shocked and a little angry at the deception as are most people in the article.

This has been my dealing with Verizon throughout their history. When I switched from Verizon DSL to Earthlink DSL (a significant savings by the way) they disconnected my service immediately and failed to notify Earthlink that the circuit was available until I complained to Earthlink and they found out what had happened. At that time they immediately activated the circuit but it was apparent that Verizon's intention was to make Earthlink look bad and inconvenience me. It is quite obvious that they are out to eliminate competition at all costs.

I cannot urge you enough to take two actions. One, contact the FCC, your senator, your representive, anyone and protest this attempt to eliminate competition by this telecommunications monster!! The other, DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH VERIZON!!!

Thoughts anyone?

Do we have any prophets out there?

Today in church we heard about the prophet Elisah who took over from the prophet Elijah. It was interesting that the ability to speak on God's behalf was widely believed and accepted in Bibilical times. The story that we heard involved a great general who suffered from leprosy and sought the assistance of the king of Israel who referred him to the prophet Elisah. Here is the leader of the military being referred by the head of government and yet today we are skeptical because our President is an avowed United Methodist and takes his spirituality somewhat seriously. How things have changed.

More importantly, what about this prophecy thing? Why is the Bible literally filled with books of prophetic sayings and we read them every weekend (depending upon your particular faith) and have no trouble accepting that these were words from people of God? Why, then, do we have trouble talking about God in our daily lives? Why do we shy away from discussing our faith on a daily basis? Are there such things as prophets around today? Who are they?

Thoughts anyone?

More untold news from Iraq

I was sent the following link to a story by writer Michael Yon. I've checked his website and his story is fascinating. I would encourage all readers to add it to their list of favorites and check it on occasion. He presents a view of the US soldier in action in Iraq that is not usually shown on the major media outlets because it shows the reasons and reactions for our continued presence in that troubled country.

This link in particular is very graphic and disturbing. I recommend it to show the ferocity and desperation of the enemy of Iraqis and the lengths they will go to to win. It reminds us that the men who perpetrated 9-11 are not gone, not subdued, and not conquered, they've merely focussed on Iraqis.......for now.

Read with care and be prepared for some graphic pictures.


"WHY DON'T AL QAEDA ATROCITIES GET MEDIA ATTENTION?
Yon's story doesn't get attention because it is humiliating.
It is humiliating because it is obvious that we media – and our allies in the state department, the legal trade, the NGOs, the Democratic Party, the UN, etc., - can’t do squat about such determined use of force.

Our words, images, arguments and skills can’t stop the killing. Only the rough soldiers and their guns can solve the problem, and we won’t admit that fact because the admission would weaken our influence and our claim to social status.

So we pretend Yon’s massacre – and the North Korean killing fields, the Arab treatment of women, the Arab hatred of Israel, etc. - doesn’t exist, and instead focus our emotions and attention on the somewhat-bad domestic things that we can ‘fix’ with our DC-based allies. Things such as Abu Ghraib, wiretapping, etc. When we ‘fix’ them, then we get status, applause, power, new jobs, ego, etc.

Please don’t be surprised. We media are an interest group not much different from the automakers, the unions, and the farmers."

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/bless-the-beasts-and-children.htm

A Long Distance Hug

Follow this link to a news story of a magnificent woman....

http://mfile.akamai.com/21772/wmv/gannett.download.akamai.com/21772/streaming/wmv/hancockportraits.asx

Peapod - Lighten the Load this Holiday Season with $10 in Free Groceries (468x60)